Subject: New beginings From: InaRuth@aol.com Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 19:30:32 EDT

Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 2.7 for Mac sub 3
Status: O
X-Status: 

Ina here:

I've just returned from the first weekend of the next Partnership course.  My
experience of the weekend was (surprise) very different.  I believe the
difference in my experience was from a difference in my being.

I have a list of people who would like to join this email group.  I'm hesitant
for two reasons (1) can they be incorporated into this conversation; and (2)
the current conversation is so "I" individual, is it "safe" or sensible to add
them here?

I have been enjoying the parts of this conversation that have been an
exploration.   I have not been enjoying the parts of the conversation that
have been personal.  I've enjoyed "offline" conversations with a number of the
people in this group as my personal expression.  However, for me, the
personality inclusions have not been appreciated - mostly because they take
the conversation to Paris and also because it detours this from the
distinctions we're exploring.

So.  My question has become:  Can we have this inquiry be about the
distinctions of Partnership?  Can we grant being to contributions while still
staying on track?

My intention (original) tonight was to share some of the explorations I've
been engaging in through the journal.  I find myself stopped.  It ain't easy
to stop me!  Or maybe it is and it doesn't look like it.  But having read what
was waiting to be read, I really don't want to play.  I have a maverick streak
against being labelled and every time it's happened here, I want to go away.
I at best clam up and wait until it all passes.  But I won't this time.

I have been told by people that they appreciate my inquiries.  For me this
doesn't match up to "pontificating".  If what I'm doing is pontificating, I'll
withdraw from the communication.  The connotative value of that word is
immensley negative for me.  Or being told I don't listen to the "in between".

So, first of all, I don't know what the hell either of those mean to me or
anyone else.  Second of all, I request responsibility for occuring.  Third of
all, I request safety for people.

Can we return to the inquiry into the Partnership distinctions?  I love each
person on this group I know (and honor those I don't), however my time online
in this group is for the purpose of furthering the inquiry, not getting/being
opinionated or personal.

love,
i

From sbauter@juno.com Sun Aug 16 23:27:47 1998
>From sbauter@juno.com  Sun Aug 16 23:27:47 1998
Received: from mx03.netaddress.usa.net (mx03.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.140])
	by pony-2.mail.digex.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA09976
	for ; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 23:27:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 17110 invoked by uid 0); 17 Aug 1998 03:27:46 -0000
Received: from x12.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.26] by mx03 via mtad (2.6) 
	with ESMTP id mx03-cHqDbt0103; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 03:27:45 GMT
Received: (from sbauter@juno.com)
 by x12.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id DLTSSALX; Sun, 16 Aug 1998 22:59:20 EDT
To: InaRuth@aol.com
Cc: LHanawalt@aol.com, Carole.Pelchat@state.ma.us, artbcaus@tiac.net,
        sbauter@juno.com, sauter@thecia.net, REALSteve@aol.com,
        ANTMARIA@aol.com, wware@world.std.com, edgb@igc.apc.org,
        lucinda@bostonbookreview.com, wjcadogan@ra.rockwell.com,
        SNHemail@juno.com, camacho@tiac.net, kclark@nh.ultranet.com,
        chrismcd@ma.ultranet.com, janemerm@tiac.net, JanetKyle@juno.com,
        steve.carey@gartner.com, karens@ayermoving.com,
        Victor_J_Hoffman@fleet.com, rfulcher@us.lhsgroup.com,
        sawins@netonecom.net, gammonw@ibm.net, Sattinger1@aol.com,
        bstuhlmu.infoscan@medimedia.com, TCGitles@aol.com, lskamil@umich.edu,
        Idadb@aol.com, eastboard@compuserve.com, jhlart@unforgettable.com,
        Sophietwo@aol.com, SandySings@aol.com, Heather_S_Cannon@armstrong.com,
        BarbaraH@gate.net, SGross9577@aol.com, goostvog@csc.com,
        vip@ectg.demon.co.uk, ab@e24mp.demon.co.uk, R.E.Ballard@usa.net,
        kohlmayr@snet.net, dburns@pica.army.mil, mekroska@nmia.com,
        sfrank2@csc.com, KEVJE@aol.com, Ldemian@aol.com,
        73163.1747@compuserve.com, bewens@mindspring.com,
        kl.casto@rocketmail.com, kcai@greenmail.net,
        CIBOROWSKI@a1.tch.harvard.edu, LDREWG@aol.com, Stan_Carpenter@ibm.net,
        robynart@wans.net, ahndy@best.com
Subject: Re: New beginings From: InaRuth@aol.com Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 23:00:23 -0400
How the Web Was Won
Subject: Re: New beginings
From: InaRuth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 23:00:23 -0400

Message-ID: <19980816.230024.3310.0.sbauter@juno.com>
References: 
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-7,9-10,12-17,19-21,23-40