Subject: Is this useful? From: Steve Goldberg Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:26:12 -0400
How the Web Was Won
Subject: Is this useful? From: Steve Goldberg Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:26:12 -0400
Sender: Steve Goldberg 
To: "INTERNET:LHanawalt@aol.com" ,
        Andrew Mackenzie , Robyn Jamison ,
        "\[unknown\]" , "\[unknown\]" ,
        Jean Ciborowski ,
        Ken Cunningham & John Spencer ,
        Lynn Casto ,
        Betty Ewens , Lisa Demian ,
        "\[unknown\]" , Susan Frank ,
        Elaine Kroska , David Burns ,
        Gerda Kohlmayr , Rex Ballard ,
        Andrew Bindon , Vip Vyas ,
        Geert , Seth Grossman ,
        Barbara Hollinger ,
        Heather Cannon ,
        Sandy Harnes ,
        Sophie Ben-Shitta ,
        Jan Lichtenstein ,
        Ida-Meri de Blanc , Lisa Kamil ,
        Toni Gitles ,
        Brian Stuhlmuller ,
        Andi Sattinger , Wayne Gammon ,
        Herb & Pat Sawin ,
        "Fulcher,Ray" ,
        "\[unknown\]" ,
        Karen Strickland ,
        "\[unknown\]" ,
        "\[unknown\]" ,
        Jane Mermelstein ,
        Christine McDermott ,
        Kitty Clark ,
        Serena and Joseph Camacho ,
        "Shirley Holt,Kate Sahlin" ,
        Bill Cadogan ,
        Lucinda Jewell ,
        linda heald , Will Ware ,
        Maria Santangelo ,
        Steve Honyotski ,
        Stephen Sauter 
Message-ID: <199808201126_MC2-56B1-CA42@compuserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by pony-2.mail.digex.net id LAA02821
Status: O
X-Status: 

Hey ya'll:

Last night I was journaling and was struck with an idea - I suggest that
there's the same four distinctions in the field PE that we created in the
other 4 fields, and that there's:

PE -> PE
PE -> NOTPE
NOTPE->PE
NOTPE->NOTPE

I think that we as human beings have pretty well-developed sense of NOTPE,
and here's a few cliches that while they may be classifiable elsewhere,
seem to me to belong to the NOTPE side of Partnership.

Give 'em enough rope to hang 'emself
You can't please all the people all the time
Run with the big dogs or stay on the porch
I'm not my brother's keeper
If you want it done right you have to do it yourself

See what I mean?  I find this correlates with the cliches that have been
coming out in my collages, they don't have the same kind of simplistic
individualistic flavor as before, instead they speak from something larger
than myself and my notions.  Now I guess they're still cat2's some cat1's,
few cat3's.  Is there something useful here?

There's a sort of universal spiritual belief that we all come from being
related, so that would imply that this created field of Partnership has a
predecessor.  And if so, then we all have a background of "not-it", since
(up until now...) we live in a dualistic universe.   Which points me back
to the PE-NOTPE conversation.  Whaddya think?

Steve
(until now, anyway....)

From Heather_S_Cannon@armstrong.com Thu Aug 20 13:14:21 1998
>From Heather_S_Cannon@armstrong.com  Thu Aug 20 13:14:21 1998
Received: from mx03.netaddress.usa.net (mx03.netaddress.usa.net [204.68.24.140])
	by pony-1.mail.digex.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA17661
	for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 13:14:20 -0400 (EDT)