Subject: Re: Banners (Was Report Supplies Blueprint for Media From: Steven Bonisteel Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:28:58 -0400
How the Web Was Won
Subject: Re: Banners (Was Report Supplies Blueprint for Media From: Steven Bonisteel Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:28:58 -0400
  E-Commerce)
In-Reply-To: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
Reply-To: Steven Bonisteel 
Precedence: bulk
Status: O
X-Status: 

-----------> This message was posted to the ONLINE-NEWS list. <-----------

At 10:55 AM 8/20/98 +0000, you Eric Magill wrote:

 >them reach THEIR goals more effectively than a mere text link.
Without 
 >click-throughs, we have no proof that our banners are doing this.

Television, print and outdoor advertising seem to survive without (in
most cases) an exact equivalent to the "click-through".

If I run into a nifty Nike "banner" on the Web, what difference does
it make whether I go to the company's Website? The important thing is
that, next time I'm buying shoes, I try on, and then buy, a pair of
Nikes.

Is it difficult to show that a banner ad helped influence that
decision? Ya, exactly the same way it's difficult for Nike to
determine if one of their image ads on TV is having a similar effect.
Nothing new there.

I think Eric Magil is describing a situation where the target Website
may in fact *be* the product. The click-though issue in that case may
be entirely different than for running shoes. If you are selling
shoes, does a 15% click-though rate mean more sales than a 1% rate?
Maybe you can sell more shoes with some great banners and *no*
click-throughs.

The click-through fetish supposes only one goal: herd everyone to the
advertiser's Website. That mindset is a perfect setup for bad banner
advertising. Most companies are not selling Websites.

SRB




 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 Steven Bonisteel                                      P. 613.531.4764
 Kingston, ON                                          F. 613.545.9148 
 steveb@typecast.com




->  ONLINE-NEWS uses Lyris mailing list software. http://www.lyris.com  <-
-> Change your list settings:  http://www.planetarynews.com/online-news <-
->   Online-News is archived: http://www.planetarynews.com/on-archive   <-
You are subscribed to online-news as: [rballard@access.digex.net]
To unsubscribe, forward this msg to leave-online-news-20155U@clio.lyris.net
SPONSORS: Email Publishing - http://www.emailpub.com
Knight Ridder Real Cities - http://www.realcities.com


From bounce-online-news-20155@clio.lyris.net Thu Aug 20 15:52:11 1998
>From bounce-online-news-20155@clio.lyris.net  Thu Aug 20 15:52:11 1998
Received: from clio.lyris.net (clio.lyris.net [207.90.155.3])
	by pony-1.mail.digex.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA03731
	for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from server.indra.com ([204.144.142.2]) by clio.lyris.net with Lyris Server version 2.554; 20 Aug 98 12:47:35 PDT7
Received: from indra.com (net.indra.com [204.144.142.1])
	by server.indra.com (8.8.5/) with ESMTP id PAA26178
	for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:55:18 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (ne.mediaone.net [24.128.1.70])
	by indra.com (8.8.5/Spike-8-1.0) with ESMTP id NAA23403
	for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 13:50:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from eudora (domicile.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.56.144])
	by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA16252
	for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: 
X-Sender: mwinnig#pop2.tiac.net@wingatepc
To: online-news@planetarynews.com