In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



On Fri, 14 Apr 1995, Paul Jones wrote:

> See what happened once they let Prodigy and AOL and news reporters online:
> ;->
> Off the Cypherpunks list:
> 
> ---begin fwd---
> From: nwns@dxm.ernet.in (The netWalker News Service)
> Subject: Survey: Paedophilia on the Internet, the real numbers
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> 
> April 10 (nWNS): The netWalker News Service recently completed an 
> extensive survey of the over 20 million users of the Internet, and 
> have found that 88.5% express paedophilic tendencies. A previous survey,
> conducted 5 years ago, showed that only 40% of Internet users expressed
> interest in child pornography, while the latest figure is 93%. This
> dangerous trend coincides with the increasing popularity of the Internet
> and on-line services, especially the increased coverage in the popular
> media.

Sounds like the conclusions of a fundamentalist doing a WAIS Search like:
(children kids child boy girl young ) AND (sex pornography censorship 
paedop* ero* lust ...) |wc
for a reallyy interesting statistic do a "join" of the two terms :-).  
You should ket about 100%


> Additionally, 60.4% of the users have access to nuclear, chemical or 
> biological weaponry, and are extremely likely given their anarchist 
> beliefs to resort to terrorism. In the 1990 survey, the corresponding 
> figure was 23%. 
> 
> The nWNS is of the opinion that the solution to these alarming developments
> is to legislate a complete ban on media coverage of the Internet, augmented
> with amendments to the International Treaty on the Rights of the Child, 
> following the recently passed ban on terrorists and paedophiles themselves.
> 
> nWNS bulletin #95Q20341
> All nWNS Internet user statistics have a margin of error of 3%
> ---end fwd---
> 

From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue Apr 18 17:53:54 1995
Status: O
X-Status: