Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 19:07:18 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
On Thu, 20 Apr 1995, John Van Zwieten wrote:
>
> >Rosalind Resnick is right both that this effort may be starting a bit late
> >and that there remains a lot more to be done if national advertising is to be
> >attracted to online newspapers. The New Century Network, at best, may create
> >a defacto national SAU for online newspapers. At worst, it is a circling of
> >old media wagons on a threatening New Media frontier.
>
> YES!!!
>
> This NCN is more than a year behind infinet which had pretty much the same
> idea and made it happen quickly. I just got an e-mail talking about
> infinet signing up CBS to provide internet connects for all affiliates.
> These will be directly competative with NCN. They will have a serious
> head start and plenty of time to sign up new users.
I think one of the big factors may be that advertizers who have
established a WEB exposure are getting a very good return on their
investment.
> This newspaper bunch has never made anything happen quickly. This is another
> reactive response to the continued errosion of the share of mind that
> newspapers hold.
It may be a simple issue of having to face the fact that advertisers are
spending less money on print ads and more on WEB ads. I was astonished
to see that buttons (1 column/line) could go for as much as $7,000/week!
It certainly creates an urgency to get a popular (35,000 hits/day) home
page! Even a niche of 2,000 hits/day of investors would make S&P raise
eyebrows.
> John
Rex Ballard
From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue May 2 19:32:14 1995