Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 16:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199505091356.IAA03706@subzero>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
On Tue, 9 May 1995, david d `zoo' zuhn wrote:
>
> The internet exists in it's current form, not because of the technical
> superiority, but because of it's evolutionary development under GPL.
>
> I think you're overstating the importance of GPL'd software. Most WWW
> software isn't GPL'd. The Berkeley networking code that is the base
> of the Internet protocols aren't GPL'd.
The original WWW software (Mosaic and Lynx) were, and are covered by a
copyright/license similar to GPL. The big difference is that they let
you know that you can negotiate for royalties. This is also a feature of
GPL-3.
The Berkely code IS also available under a similar GPL agreement.
> screen. I have a 23 inch monitor, and 1280x1024 resolution, I run a
> variant of Unix, and I run X11 at 100dpi resolution. I might want 8
> I don't know about your variant of Unix, but most are NOT GPL'd, and
> neither is X11, for that matter.
OSF/1 is available under GPL, as is MACH, as is Linux and 90% of BSD.
Only about 5% of SysVR4 is copyrighted for exclusive use of AT&T. Unix
was the first Public-Domain software (Version 6) to be put under GPL
(Berkely BSD2.1). The source code licenses for commercial distribution
(of versions containing commercial/proprietary enhancements are very
expensive - $50K to $3 million). I can give away Linux, or sell it for a
modest fee, but I can't do anything that would give me the monopoly
rights to charge $500/copy without negotiating terms.
Check out tsx11.mit.edu, this is the central clearing house for X11.
Rex Ballard
Standard & Poor's/McGraw-Hill
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect
the Management of the McGraw-Hill Companies.
From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue May 9 20:23:12 1995