Date: Tue, 9 May 1995 20:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <01BA1DAF.6D1B54E0@jeremy.ing.com>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
On Tue, 9 May 1995, Jeremy Allaire wrote:
> > 2.4 for Microsoft(TM) Windows already supports all of those features.
> < the spyglass version?>>
> Nope, it's all "home grown" by NCSA's staff of four Windows programmers.
So how come NCSA didn't put THAT on the web site?
> <>
> How wonderful, for that ever diminishing world of UNIX clients. :-)
Yeah we're only doubling in number every 6 months, the internet doubled
every 4. What is the growth rate for all variants of Windows? :-).
I caught a notice on PR NewsWire that indicated that Linux is estimated
at about 1 million users. That was back in January.
For Linux, I get Netscape, or Mosaic. They are both real nice :-),
especially when I'm running two or three at a time.
> > Also, I am told, they are going to take advantage of Netscape's innovations
> > by incorporating SSL which has been distributed as a free public specification
> > and free source to educational institutions.
> <>
>
> The correction you provide is incorrect. The Secure Socket's Layer standard,
> as provided and published by Netscape, is available for free use by
> educational or non-profit organizations for integration with TCP/IP products,
> particularly Web browsers.
I was under the impression that S-HTTP (secure http) was now in the draft
stages of becoming an RFC (I've been reviewing the spec). I have not
been able to find the SSL RFC, could you give me a reference?
> Given the increasing installed base of SSL compliant servers, the NCSA team
> is wise in adopting this and is providing a great service to those who would like
> to use a non-commercial browser. And Netscape's give-away is also a generous
> gesture, I think (though certainly not altruistic).
I have no doubt that many companies will be happy to pay handsomely to
put in proprietary performance tuning (like netscape's) and of course put
their company logo's on the over-all Master form. I can think of at
least 20 who would want the "X company" web browser with mosaic in small
print. That's cool. :-).
> My point didn't have to do with the NCSA copyright or technology use stipulations.
Actually, I think it's great that NCSA has been staying active in the
"Browser Business".
> Best,
>
> Jeremy Allaire
Rex Ballard
Standard & Poor's/McGraw-Hill
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect
the Management of the McGraw-Hill Companies.
From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue May 9 22:06:35 1995