In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 



On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, fathers wrote:

> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 13:31:02 -0800
> From: spg@ecst.csuchico.edu
> 
> Dear MH,
> 
> Sure, you can and please send me this cite if you find it.  Every tidbit
> helps.  But the real legal sledgehammer the Constitutional violation of
> Double Jeopardy.  The courts are stealing children (1st penalty) and then
> imposing additional penalties (2nd when to see the kids, 3rd, giving all
> power to women, 4th, forcing payment for denial of rights, 5th, reduced time
> with children, 6th, forcing fathers to pay taxes, then; imposing additional
> taxes cloaked as 'Child-Support' against fathers, etc., etc., etc., etc.,
> etc., etc., etc., etc.,)  I've come up with no less than thirteen penalties
> held against fathers that go against this one issue ALONE!!!!

Let's not forget the double and quadruple taxation that occurs when an 
NCP pays another NCP for services or goods that are not tax deductable.  
The taxes could actually be as high as 90% of the actual amount of the 
product.  The breakdown:
	First Father:
		14%  FICA/Social Security
		 2%  Medicare
		38%  Federal Tax
		10%  State Income Tax
		 5%  City Tax (New York City)
		 7%  Sales Tax
		 5%  Property and excise taxes.
		20%  Child Support.
	Total - 101%
Hmmm - Something doesn't add up here?
In other words, If I get a raise after breaking the $50K barrier, it 
actually costs me money to make more money.  If I make 75,000 I can pay 
$25250 in taxes and child support increases.  Interesting!

Back to the original scenario - purchasing services from an NCP Doctor, 
Lawyer, Dentist, or Accountant.  Everything after deductions would be 
taxed for a total of 151%.  That $200 Root Canal really cost me $300, and
the guy I paid actually lost money.

And the few remaining deductions?  Mortgage Interest - Yeah, like I can 
really get a Mortgage with my current financial statement - NOT!  Would 
you loan money to someone who pays more in taxes than he makes?

Maybe Steve Forbes has the only idea that makes real sense - FLAT TAX, NO 
Deductions.

> We feel this is a true nut to crack and really can't be argued against.
> (They will argue syntax or the meaning of the penalties--but the result will
> be the same--multiple penalties FOR NO CRIME!!!  Geez.)
> 
> Attack on this issue and there will be wins.
> 
> Sincerely,
> RLCII
> SPG
> 
> >Cheers. MH.


	Rex Ballard - Director of Electronic Distribution
	http://cnj.digex.net/~rballard



From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue Feb 13 14:40:38 1996