Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 10:34:43 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <199607052030.NAA02901@primenet.com>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Rex Ballard - Director of Electronic Distribution
Standard & Poor's/McGraw-Hill
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect
the Management of the McGraw-Hill Companies.
http://cnj.digex.net/~rballard
On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, Josh Stern wrote:
> In article you write:
>
> >There is one group of users who will be fanatically devoted to NT, those
> >who have never tried a modern version of Unix or Linux (with X11/R6).
> >
> >Ignorance was once defined by a wise man as contempt prior to
> >investigation. I've tried both, I prefer Linux.
> >
> >Anyone who has tried both want to take their stand for NT?
>
> I'm a Linux fan, but I bet you will get a bunch of takers
> for this. The thing is, what they prefer is NT + $2500
> of commercial software to Linux + freebies. When a lot
> more commercial software becomes available for Linux,
> then I think it will be hard to find people who prefer
> NT + $n of commercial software to Linux + freebies + $n
> of commercial software.
It's actually been a bit interesting. Several software publishers are now
issuing commercial software, along with a "complimentary" Linux
distribution. Flagship makes a clipper work-alike that sells for $200 and
comes with a complimentary Slackware Distribution.
There is also an abundance of corporate site-licenseable share-ware.
Single-user rates are "voluntary $30-50", corporate rates are "All you can
eat $2000-$5000/year compulsery". The thinking is, individual users on
home computers generally don't want to spend lots of money on personal
software. Corporate users don't like to have to endure 5-30 day delays
from the time the P.O. is filled out to the time the "Shrink Wrapped Box"
is delivered. If a small publishing house can sell $5000/year
subscriptions to 200 businesses world-wide, there is suddenly a sufficient
revenue base to sustain the maintenance and enhancement cycle. It isn't
terribly different from the way Microsoft deals with Hardware
Manufacturers.
> - Josh
Rex
From rballard@cnj.digex.net Tue Jul 9 15:11:45 1996
Status: O
X-Status: