Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 02:28:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <51ucis$fii@news.Hawaii.Edu>
Message-ID:
References: <51ucis$fii@news.Hawaii.Edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Rex Ballard - Director of Electronic Distribution
http://cnj.digex.net/~rballard
On 20 Sep 1996, Dave Tholen wrote:
> Bernd Backhaus writes:
>
> > jw@qits.net.au wrote 18 Aug 96 in article <4v73ur$qce@hobyah.cc.uq.oz.au>:
>
> >> This is interesting. I've seen lots of PPC offerings from Motorola
> >> and Apple but IBM seems to be a little quieter?
IBM has been shifting to AIX for the last 3 years. It is a quiet
"evolution". AIX is mostly like UNIX except that it has better
internationalization features. Also, AIX has a strong NICHE in the
bridging of SNA/SAA to the TCP/IP environment.
Most manufacturers realise that their best chance at keeping their markets
is UNIX/OSF/Linux/... Unfortunately, there is very little that is
newsworthy, little that gives one a competitive edge over the others, and
it is better marketing strategy to hype the daylights out of things like
MVS/ESA, AS/400, and OS/2, where profit margins are larger and competition
is non-existant. Even in these domains, most contracts are going with
specialist engines such as MVS on the Mainframe and AIX on a RISC/6000 as
the "Communications Front End". This protects their "high margin"
products while minimizing resistance to an "All SNA Solution".
> > Expect that to change soon. IBM has already started with Object REXX and
> > OpenDOC for NT and obviously just teamed with Motorola and Bull to encourage
> > ISVs to port to NT/PPC. IBM themselves are rumored to port MS Office to
> > PPC...
Nobody is being stupid. IBM can afford to throw away $10 Million on a
development team to support NT. For them that is 'Pin Money'. DEC
learned the hard way the cost of putting all of your eggs in the Microsoft
Basket (Laid off 1/3 of their work force over 3 years?). It seems like
Rueters, Dow Jones, and S&P are about the only major VMS shops left. None
of them received anything like a working NT for an SMP Alpha.
> Interesting rumor. Do you think Microsoft is likely to provide source
> code for their Office suite to IBM?
Possibly, in exchange for source code the the Lotus Office Suite.
Remember, IBM got exclusive control of OS/2 2.x and the result was a
disaster.
Rex
From rballard@cnj.digex.net Thu Oct 24 01:55:04 1996
Status: O
X-Status: