Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1995 01:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mark Loundy
cc: Marganne@aol.com, online-news@marketplace.com
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-online-news@marketplace.com
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Sat, 10 Jun 1995, Mark Loundy wrote:
>
> Marganne,
>
> It's fine to bring articles that may be of interest to the members of this
> group, but posting the entire thing here is a clear and blatant copyright
> violation.
>
> Telecommunications Chair, NPPA
> Mark Loundy, Southern California http://sunsite.unc.edu/nppa/
> ------------------------ ----------------------- -------------------------
Has this list developed a policy re: posting of copyrighted matter?
"Clear and blatant" is one possible standard.
Should we be monitoring for observance of fair use limits?
It's not as much fun. :(
Not as educational.
It might highlight our future issues in a *real* way.
If we attempt such a policy, or enforcement thereof, would we increase
our liability ala Prodigy?
Heck, while I'm at it, is it "libelous" to publicly characterize someone's
act as "clear and blatant" copyright infringement? If so, what is an
appropriate way to deal with such issues in online publishing forums?
James Cook
From owner-online-news@marketplace.com Sat Jun 10 09:27:11 1995
Received: from marketplace.com (root@marketplace.com [199.45.128.10]) by cnj.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10385 ; for ; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 09:27:09 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by marketplace.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id EAA28990 for online-news-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 04:24:54 -0600
Received: from netcom4.netcom.com (jcook@netcom4.netcom.com [192.100.81.107]) by marketplace.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA28982 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 04:24:51 -0600
Received: by netcom4.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id DAA11301; Sat, 10 Jun 1995 03:27:05 -0700